
Blog
Congress didn’t pass Clarity. We can still build.
Here is what it means if you run a business and you have been wondering what you can actually put to work.
On Tuesday, September 15, 2026, the Senate failed to advance the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act. Newsrooms covering the cloture vote reported a 49–50 tally. Cloture needed 60. The bill did not reach the floor.
Here is what it means if you run a business and you have been wondering what you can actually put to work.
We are builders. Wallets, nodes, point-of-sale, websites, apps, CRM, workshops, and managed agents that answer the phone. Bitcoin and Stacks when they belong in the job. If you want something built, we can build it. If the thing you want also needs a lawyer, a CPA, or a licensed financial professional to sign off, that blessing has to come from them — not from us. We will not pretend we are those people.
One time, so we can get on with the useful part: Block9 is a Missouri technology company. We do not give legal, regulatory, investment, or tax advice, and we never hold your keys or your funds. You sign your own transactions. Questions about how a product is treated under the law belong with your counsel and with the agencies that publish the rules. If you are in a licensed line of work — banking, credit, insurance, money movement, and the like — or you operate under state rules that go beyond the federal picture, that overlay is yours to walk with counsel. We build the technology.
What we know
A market-structure bill did not become law this week. Reporting on the vote: NPR, CoinDesk, Axios.
In March the SEC and CFTC published a joint interpretation: Application of the Federal Securities Laws to Certain Types of Crypto Assets and Certain Transactions Involving Crypto Assets (Release Nos. 33-11412 and 34-105020, File S7-2026-09, March 17, 2026). The CFTC said it will administer the Commodity Exchange Act consistent with that interpretation. That is their document. We quote the categories so you can read how they talk. We do not apply them to your facts. CFTC Release 9198-26 · SEC file S7-2026-09
The CFTC’s March 17 press release lists the five-category taxonomy as: digital commodities, digital collectibles, digital tools, stablecoins, and digital securities. Definitions below for the first three are the release’s wording as reproduced in the official SEC comment file on S7-2026-09. Read the interpretation itself for the full text.
- Digital commodities — “intrinsically linked to and derives its value from the programmatic operation of a crypto system that is ‘functional,’ as well as supply and demand dynamics, rather than from the expectation of profits from the essential managerial efforts of others.”
- Digital collectibles — “designed to be collected and/or used and may represent or convey rights to artwork, music, videos, trading cards, in-game items, or digital representations or references to internet memes, characters, current events, or trends, among other things.”
- Digital tools — “a crypto asset that performs a practical function, such as a membership, ticket, credential, title instrument, or identity badge.”
- Stablecoins and digital securities — named in the same taxonomy. We are not putting a one-line definition in quotation marks here because we are not lifting a single sentence from the PDF for those two. The full release is at the links above.
The same release also says a crypto asset that is not itself a security can still be offered subject to an investment contract, depending on how it is sold. That call belongs to counsel and to the agencies.
Congress already passed the GENIUS Act for payment stablecoins (July 18, 2025). Agencies are still writing the how-to rules. Public materials point to January 2027 for the main issuer obligations. Taking a dollar coin at checkout and issuing one are two different builds. CRS overview; Treasury.
The SEC proposed Regulation Crypto Assets in August — possible offering paths and a safe harbor. Comments close October 20, 2026. A proposal is not a finished rule. SEC docket; Chair Atkins, Sept. 14.
On September 1 the Commission separately proposed to modernize the rules for registered transfer agents — the firms that keep the official list of who owns a company’s shares. Chair Atkins wrote: “This proposal would streamline and modernize the Commission’s rules to reflect transfer agents’ current processes and operations, including the use of electronic communications and blockchain technology in connection with securities offerings and the transfer of shares.” That is a proposed update to how securities records can be kept. It is not a product we sell, and it is not a finished rule. @SECGov · @SECPaulSAtkins · SEC press release 2026-81
The CFTC has published work on perpetual contracts and related market infrastructure, and Chair Selig has described a joint effort with the SEC under the name Project Crypto. That is their agenda. CFTC policy on perpetual contracts; Chair Selig remarks.
On September 16, CFTC Chairman Michael S. Selig posted a statement after the vote. Quoted in full from that post (@ChairmanSelig):
“The outcome of yesterday’s Senate vote was unfortunate. Americans deserve regulatory clarity, legal certainty, and consumer protections in crypto asset markets. President Trump promised to deliver a future-proof crypto asset regulatory market structure one way or the other, and we will help him get the job done using our existing statutory authorities. The U.S. is and will remain the crypto capital of the world. The CFTC is locked in and ready to ship its rules for the new frontier of finance.”
That is the Chair speaking for the agency. It is not a permission slip for any particular build. We will read the rules when they ship.
What we’re waiting to see
- The rules Chairman Selig said the CFTC is ready to ship under existing authority — text, not the quote
- Whether Regulation Crypto Assets becomes a final rule, and what the text actually says
- Whether the agencies later turn the March interpretation into joint rules — they have said they may; nothing is final
- Finished GENIUS licensing paperwork
- Final transfer-agent rules after the September 1 proposal (blockchain in the official shareholder file) — comment, then text
- Whether Congress picks market structure back up after the midterms
None of that stops us from standing up the work below. It may change how other professionals later document a raise or an issuance. That is their lane.
What has always been true on our side of the table
You can take Bitcoin and hold it in a wallet you control. You can train a team so a seed phrase does not live on a sticky note. You can run a website, an app, a CRM, and an agent that picks up when the business cannot.
You can keep records — tickets, passes, invoices, work orders, warranties, memberships — in software that is honest about what it is: a record, not a pitch. That is the job we have been building toward. Our tokenization engine is being built for those document types on Stacks, anchored to Bitcoin — tickets, passes, gift cards, invoices, work orders, warranties, memberships, as we have described the build. It is not live. When the agencies talk about a “digital tool” — “a practical function, such as a membership, ticket, credential, title instrument, or identity badge” — that is the vocabulary they use for this kind of record. We are building the tools for businesses and individuals to engage with the blockchain through seamless, intuitive interfaces.
Those jobs did not wait on Tuesday’s vote. They do not disappear because of it.
What we will build with you
- Get paid. Point-of-sale, wallet setup, a node if you want one, staff trained before we leave. You hold the keys.
- Run the business. Sites, apps, web2 systems, CRM, and Agents by Block9 — Support, Sales, Operations. That work is live today. Services · Agents.
- Learn the tools. Workshops: AI Basics, Bitcoin Basics, Bitcoin & Bitcoin Layers. Leave able to use them.
- Keep a record on-chain, when the engine is ready. Same engine as above. When contracts deploy they will be readable on the Stacks explorer. Until then we will not sell you a launch date.
If what you want is a token sale, a company coin, or a product whose story is “buy this and benefit as we grow,” we can still talk about the software. The blessing to offer it has to come from your lawyer and, where it applies, from licensed financial professionals. We will build after that conversation — not instead of it.
Three things we like to know on a 10-minute intro
- What are you trying to stand up — a site, an app, payments, an agent, education or a workshop, something on-chain, or a mix?
- Who is it for, and what should they be able to do when they leave?
- Who holds the keys and signs the transactions when we pack up?
Tell us what you want built. We will talk through the work. If your counsel or other licensed professionals need to bless a piece of it, that conversation happens with them. Then we build.
Talk with AgentB9 on block9.app — it can answer questions and schedule a follow-up. Prefer a person? Call (636) 224-8069. sales@block9.app
Sources
- NPR, “Crypto suffers major defeat as Senate rejects Clarity Act,” Sept. 15, 2026
- CoinDesk, “Crypto’s biggest Senate push falls flat…,” Sept. 15, 2026
- Axios, “Crypto’s Clarity Act fails to advance in Senate,” Sept. 15, 2026
- SEC and CFTC, Application of the Federal Securities Laws to Certain Types of Crypto Assets and Certain Transactions Involving Crypto Assets, Release Nos. 33-11412 & 34-105020, File S7-2026-09 (March 17, 2026); CFTC 9198-26; SEC S7-2026-09
- SEC, Regulation Crypto Assets, File S7-2026-27
- SEC Chair Paul S. Atkins, Solana Policy Institute remarks, Sept. 14, 2026
- @SECGov and @SECPaulSAtkins, Sept. 1, 2026 — proposed transfer-agent modernization; SEC PR 2026-81
- GENIUS Act, P.L. 119-27; CRS IN12553
- U.S. Treasury GENIUS NPRM release, Aug. 17, 2026
- CFTC Policy Statement on perpetual contracts, May 29, 2026
- CFTC Chair Michael Selig, “The Next Phase of Project Crypto”
- CFTC Chairman Michael S. Selig statement following the Sept. 15 Senate vote, posted Sept. 16, 2026: https://x.com/ChairmanSelig/status/2100232064259735589